User Portlet
Featured Contributor
| Discussions |
|---|
| Sorry, Zhao, but your questions and code are a nightmare. I feel you want to do some kind of restructuring code, actually, just rename variables. This is a trivial task and done with Find/Replace (Edit-menu > Find... within the Wolfram desktop). Just... |
| This happened with: - Windows 10 Pro (64-bit), 21H2, Build 19044.1949 - Wolfram|One 13.1.0 - Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3840QM CPU @ 2.80GHz 2.80 GHz - 16 GB RAM I just tried it on: - Windows 11 Pro (64-bit), 21H2, Build 22000.918 -... |
| > Another issue regarding language is the almost exclusive use of English. I may be wrong, but Mathematica is one of the few software systems that addresses this: they have what are essentially subtitles for their code. You still have to type the... |
| I want to assign a keyboard shortcut, say "Shift+Ctrl+I", to apply the style "InlineFormula" to the current selection. (I have changed this style, but this does not matter here). I know that this is possible by modifying the... |
| Yes Hans, that's the problem. Actually, it's not severe. What I'm doing is: - Prepare the list of all cells - Use CreateDocument with that complete list. Actually, I was just wondering where this "dirty-flag" is hidden, or how it can be... |
| OK, Daniel. I can live with it. It needs just omitting the default for the other parameters. |
| This works indeed, Mariusz (within 0,06 secs). **But why?** I had never thought that solving in Complex would be easier than within Reals. But anyway this is a valid solution. I can apply the Reals-condition later to the result. |
| Robert, this solution with NumericQ works indeed. I had in mind that NumericQ was Listable, but it isn't. MatchQ[{1, {20, 21}, 300}, {Repeated[_?NumericQ, 3]}] (* False *) But your original proposal does not really work since AtomQ... |
| > Until now I was not aware of the important role of > $UserBaseDirectory/Applications and did not use it. I will try that > and see if my Programming Lab can work with local files there. It's a pity (or a desaster): The Programming Lab desktop... |
| Yes, of course. I forgot about that. Thanks |