Group Abstract Group Abstract

Message Boards Message Boards

7
|
36.2K Views
|
31 Replies
|
48 Total Likes
View groups...
Share
Share this post:

Why are some professors negative on Mathematica?

Posted 11 years ago
POSTED BY: Luther Nayhm
31 Replies

Something that I learned years ago (very likely from Feynman or quoted about him to me by someone else) is that, when looking at a dataset in a presentation and listening to the presenter's description of the meaning of the data, in your mind drop the data points from the graph at its extremes and decide if the conclusions make sense. Why? The data at the extremes are often there because the experiment stopped being trustworthy at roughly near those limits so the strength of those points often would be in question....

POSTED BY: David Reiss
Posted 11 years ago
POSTED BY: Bill Simpson
Posted 11 years ago
POSTED BY: Bill Simpson
Posted 11 years ago
POSTED BY: Steve M
POSTED BY: W. Craig Carter
Posted 11 years ago
POSTED BY: Steve M
POSTED BY: David Reiss
POSTED BY: Daniel Lichtblau
Posted 11 years ago
POSTED BY: Steve M
Posted 11 years ago
POSTED BY: Luther Nayhm
POSTED BY: W. Craig Carter

I basically use Mathematica for all my work unless otherwise forced asunder. I write all my documents in it and have done since around version 3 (when the typesetting became publication class).

POSTED BY: David Reiss
Posted 11 years ago
POSTED BY: Luther Nayhm

I think it was either Planck or Boltzmann who said that progress in Physics is made at funerals. You advance a new theory or process and wait for the old physicists to die. Having a Ph.D. in Physics myself, I'm allowed to say this. It's probably true for almost all fields of human endeavor.

POSTED BY: Frank Kampas
Posted 11 years ago
POSTED BY: Luther Nayhm
Posted 11 years ago
POSTED BY: Luther Nayhm

Luther, why don't you write me at djmpark@comcast.net and tell me what your project is.

Posted 11 years ago
POSTED BY: Bill Simpson

Probably not what you had but maybe related:

http://library.wolfram.com/infocenter/Conferences/5782/

This is by Paul Wellin and he may have been author or a coauthor of the work you have in mind.

POSTED BY: Daniel Lichtblau
Posted 11 years ago
POSTED BY: Luther Nayhm
POSTED BY: W. Craig Carter
Posted 11 years ago
POSTED BY: Luther Nayhm
POSTED BY: Daniel Lichtblau

Hello Danny and Luther, That makes three of us who started with punch cards.

A bizarre as it might seem, I think punch cards were a beneficial way to learn to program. I spent so much more time thinking about the program and doing thoughtful debugging because submission of a job was so painful. I confess that I often do debugging now with less reflective thought because I can do dozens of haphazard experiments in minutes--this probably speeds the debugging process as often as it slows it down.

I was sold on symbolic computation (pre-wolfram-language) when I was able to solve classical mechanics homeworks faster and more accurately than my classmates. I remember that just being able to do a taylor expansion around a point and copy down the results and redraw crt-rendered plots into my homework felt like cheating.

I also remember my own "inertia" of switching from "symbolic-program-x" which was free at Berkeley (and had opaque syntax that I had learned moderately well) to Mathematica 1.

Craig

POSTED BY: W. Craig Carter
Posted 11 years ago

Ah, memories!

POSTED BY: Luther Nayhm
Reply to this discussion
Community posts can be styled and formatted using the Markdown syntax.
Reply Preview
Attachments
Remove
or Discard