User Portlet
Discussions |
---|
I don't have a problem with posting things simultaneously but you really need to give the associated links in each post. Otherwise, suppose at one post someone answers the question. Then at the other post you're wasting folks limited time because... |
Would you elaborate a bit more on what your question is? Are you wanting code to simplify the first element of `p2` and `p3` to be the second element of `p2` and `p3`, respectively? Also, by "Gauss' formula" do you mean what's mentioned in the... |
I'm lazier than you. data = {{-1, 3}, {1, 1}, {2, 5}}; lm = LinearModelFit[data, {x, x^2}, x, IncludeConstantBasis -> False, WorkingPrecision -> \[Infinity]]; lm["BestFitParameters"] (* {-(12/11), 20/11} *) |
One can get a distribution where the PDF matches that of `InverseChiSquareDistribution[v, s]` but I'm not seeing how to get *Mathematica* to recognize that distribution as a scaled inverse chisquare distribution. Here is some code to get that... |
Henrik: Thanks! That clears it up. We are in agreement about definition of the Voigt distribution as to how it comes about as a convolution of a Gaussian and Lorentzian. It's that from my experience in this forum and the... |
Because your code is so long and there has been cut-and-paste issues, as a check Variables[Integrand] results in ![List of variables in Integrand][1] Are these the variables that you expect? [1]:... |
Are there particular values of `a`, `b`, `c`, and `d` other than those just being Real? For example, when `a=1` and `b=1`, the absolute value is just a function of `c` (as `d` disappears from the result). |
The documentation states > "StandardDeviationBaseline" standard deviation of test set values And the formula used divides the sum of squares by the length of the test set values rather than the length of the test set values minus 1 (just as... |
Cross-posted at https://mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/284503/how-do-i-add-or-correct-my-code-to-build-a-chart-like-the-one-on-the-picture. |
The issue is that making a histogram with just 3 unique numbers is just plain silly. |