Group Abstract Group Abstract

Message Boards Message Boards

11
|
30.9K Views
|
26 Replies
|
120 Total Likes
View groups...
Share
Share this post:

What was your first Mathematica version ?

Posted 4 years ago
POSTED BY: Daniel Carvalho
26 Replies

My first version of Mathematica was an alpha test on a 1/4 inch tape to run on a Sun Workstation in my office at NCSA in Illinois in the 80s. Given to me by Stephen to test long before it was called Mathematica. I may have been the first user outside of his actual developers, not sure. I used it mainly on SunOS, but later I had it on a NeXT machine, also in alpha test, I got from Jobs if memory serves. I had to hide the NeXT machine at home as no one was supposed to see it yet. I think I may have the tape somewhere in storage.

My first version of Mathematica is v2.2. I was solving a queueing model for performance analysis of a fault-tolerant system with it. Version 2 was released by floppy disks, but I could not find the box. Instead I post the picture of the box of Version 3, released by CD. I miss those days! enter image description here

POSTED BY: Kotaro Okazaki

First version used was on an Apple (??) in college for a physics class ~1988. That professor went on to write a few Physics Lab books using Mathematica. Could not afford Apple machines let alone NeXT; so for home use I later purchased Mathematica 1.2 for 386 MS-DOS (1989?). Shorly after that I got a math co-processor and updated to 386/387 version of Mathematica. I could not find those boxes but it came with Stephen Wolfram's Mathematica Book "A System for..." and a few other manuals. I have upgraded and kept my license current since.

enter image description here

POSTED BY: Hans Michel

Worldwide Mathematica Conference Chicago 1998

Attachment

Attachments:
POSTED BY: Jamie Peterson
POSTED BY: Kay Herbert

@Mark, perhaps this page can help you - Mathematica Quick Revision History:

https://www.wolfram.com/mathematica/quick-revision-history.html

POSTED BY: Vitaliy Kaurov
Posted 4 years ago

My personal bet is that the first version I used was 2.2, on university AlphaStations back in 1995. Apparently the first version I wasn't using under university licensing scheme was 4.1.1. I have to conclude that I'm a latecomer, right? (Frankly I think the reason to get a license back then was that licensing structure had become more friendly to nonprofessional individuals, but I can't quite tell 20+ years since the event!)

POSTED BY: Jari Kirma
Posted 4 years ago

My first experience with Mathematica was with whatever version was included in my purchase of a neXt computer in late 1990. I no longer have it or any documentation included. It might be 1.n or 2. Does anybody know what vsn. that would have been?

POSTED BY: Mark Harder
Posted 4 years ago
POSTED BY: David Keith

version 2.2

POSTED BY: Frank Kampas

I forgot to mention that there was also Macsyma (Lisp based) which at the time (1980's) was the dominant software in the space. Macsyma apparently had several problems, no implementation on various popular platforms, licensing, cost and ability in solving numerical problems and quickly was overtaken by Mathematica.

POSTED BY: Kay Herbert

A 3-ring conference binder, from back when we collected paper copies!

POSTED BY: Jamie Peterson

A long time ago, out of the blue, my father purchased me a copy of Mathematica 2.2 for students during a Mac World Expo in Boston. I never asked for it, he just purchased it for me and I had not idea of what to do with it. At the time I preferred to use different product called Theorist from Prescience Corporation which was much easier to use, but not programmable. It took a long time to grow on me but eventually I realized that Mathematica was better because of its flexibility and power.

POSTED BY: Gustavo Delfino

I still have my conference binder from 1999. Pages are long gone, though.

My first look to Mathematica 4.0 in college lab was as an advanced calculator. I learned first at calculus handouts written by two professors: Iara Braz and Cleide Rizzatto.

We basically solved limits, derivatives and integrals. The good part is that in the standard calculus classes with pen and paper we just solve didactic books exercises without context, and with Mathematica we were able to look at more real problems and give the dirty work to Mathematica, and focus on problem-solving as an engineer really works, modeling problems as differential and integral equations, and checking graphically the solutions.

Latter I read some Mathematica books and lots of tutorials and documentations on the WEB. Mathematica online documentation is a good place to learn too, since the beginning.

Nowadays, I look at Mathematica and Wolfram Language as a mature platform, not just for calculus but to do all kinds of advanced computation and application.

Wolfram Language makes me lazy!!! :-) When I need to do something in Java, Python or JavaScript. Those other languages require a lot of boilerplate to get to the real problem-solving, most in data science!

I appreciate the responses! They are all very interesting perspectives!!

POSTED BY: Daniel Carvalho

I remember Theorist. I had a copy of it. It was an elegant program, and being a dedicated Mac Program, more polished rendering of 3-D graphics. According to the LiveMath website, the program was sold to Waterloo Maple. Ironic, in that Maple abandoned the Macintosh during the dark days.

I also remember going to MacWorld in Boston. Nice place to get swag.

Wow @George Woodrow III, that is interesting. Would be very nice if you post here a photo of the box of Mathematica V1.1, but I understand if you don't have the time.

POSTED BY: Ahmed Elbanna

Look what I found most on Linux box:

daniel@home:/usr/local/bin$ ls -l Mathematica*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 53 mai 13 15:24 Mathematica -> /opt/Wolfram/Mathematica/12.3/Executables/Mathematica
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 53 jan 12 23:19 Mathematica12.2 -> /opt/Wolfram/Mathematica/12.2/Executables/Mathematica
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 53 jun 26  2020 Mathematica.old -> /opt/Wolfram/Mathematica/12.1/Executables/Mathematica
POSTED BY: Daniel Carvalho

Thank you George. Looks elegant, and the box is in great condition.

POSTED BY: Ahmed Elbanna
POSTED BY: Daniel Carvalho
POSTED BY: Ahmed Elbanna
Posted 4 years ago

Thanks. The timing suggests that it was either 1.2 or 2.0.

POSTED BY: Mark Harder
Reply to this discussion
Community posts can be styled and formatted using the Markdown syntax.
Reply Preview
Attachments
Remove
or Discard