Group Abstract Group Abstract

Message Boards Message Boards

5
|
22.4K Views
|
15 Replies
|
13 Total Likes
View groups...
Share
Share this post:

Testing Wolfram Education?

Posted 10 years ago
POSTED BY: Todd Rowland
15 Replies
POSTED BY: Udo Krause
Posted 10 years ago
POSTED BY: Richard Gaylord

I wasn't comparing anyone to anyone else at all, just dropping a few more datapoints for my statement that in general, people are attracted to (and not scared away from) technological products when they're really impressed by a preeminent leading figure.

So... back to the topic at hand, then: If we want to find a good way to measure the impact of WL, we probably need some statistics beyond the usual anecdotes. Who is actually using the language, and what are people doing with it? Especially outside of academic contexts, because that's the world many students want to be prepared for. Can we see some concrete quantitative evidence for WL becoming important outside of STEM, and/or outside of academia? (Obviously not a question you or I can answer conclusively, but someone at WRI must have a bit of data on this... Maybe sales numbers and support requests to start with?)

POSTED BY: Bianca Eifert
Posted 10 years ago

as far as i know, almost no programing language is identified with a specific individual (except maybe ken inversion for APL). and few people name the programming language they develop after themselves (i could be wrong - maybe bob dylan named the Dylan programming language after he created it when he wasn't writing songs LOL).

POSTED BY: Richard Gaylord
POSTED BY: Bianca Eifert
Posted 10 years ago
POSTED BY: Richard Gaylord

That's an interesting and unexpected perspective. Lots of programming languages have very charismatic and brilliant leading figures, I've always considered that a good thing. After all, a mediocre language designer without any vision is highly unlikely to develop an intuitive and usable language (let alone a beautiful one).

POSTED BY: Bianca Eifert
Posted 10 years ago
POSTED BY: Richard Gaylord

Richard, I agree complete with what you're saying, of course WL is a programming language. It's just that from personal experience, I'm not so convinced that that's the public perception just yet. So if that's still a work in progress, then it probably hasn't yet caused a broader paradigm shift. Maybe I'm just too pessimistic though.

You can already create WL packages and scripts, maybe the notebook is coming at some point?

POSTED BY: Bianca Eifert
POSTED BY: Bianca Eifert
POSTED BY: Todd Rowland
Posted 10 years ago

On the importance of computer programming to cognitive ability: Jobs was asked what practical purpose he and other early Apple employees envisioned for programming personal computers. "It didn't have to do with using them for anything practical; we used it as a way to mirror our thought process. I think everyone should learn how to program a computer, because it teaches you how to think. I view computer science as a liberal art, something everyone should learn to do."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCDkxUbalCw

POSTED BY: Richard Gaylord
POSTED BY: Bianca Eifert
POSTED BY: Kyle Keane

Very interesting, @Kyle Keane, that platform deserves a separate announcement, great work! I'd love to see you sharing your experience building it in a separate thread.

POSTED BY: Vitaliy Kaurov
Reply to this discussion
Community posts can be styled and formatted using the Markdown syntax.
Reply Preview
Attachments
Remove
or Discard