User Portlet
| Discussions |
|---|
| Yes, but it's a shame the Documentation Center still doesn't advertise this, to wit, the FindMinimum doc page still does not mention IPOPT as a Method option. There is however a doc page for IPOPTLink: IPOPTLink/tutorial/OptimizingWithIPOPT |
| Hello Rene, I'm very happy you had success! However, I'm very puzzled as to why my suggestion worked at all, if it did not identify (near) duplicate samples. Oh well, onward! :-) |
| For FITS, I always refer to my comment cell: (* !! Export[] "Data", Import "RawData" !! *) Then you can dispense with the ImageSize and BitDepth options. You'll get an array of Integers (IIRC), which if you care to, can be N[]'ed to give... |
| Hello Artemiy, What Mathematica functions are you using? One suggestion may be to employ the new (as of version 10) mesh and region functionality, see: http://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/RegionNearest.html and in particular ... |
| Hello, I just tried the OP's test code again, this time on Mathematica 10.1 under Win7 64-bit. It worked again. One suggestion is to modify the Export statement to be so: Export["image1.fits", d, "Data"] Here's a reminder that... |
| Wouldn't "indexed variables" work well here? See the section "True Dictionaries in Mathematica (5)" at http://kodu.ut.ee/~kkannike/english/prog/mathematica/ The topic of "indexed variables" (aka "indexed objects" or "subscripted variables") may... |
| func[u_?NumericQ, v_?NumericQ] := Norm[srffn[u, v] - test] |
| Quick guess -- you are using what you intend to be subscripted variables, but in fact are only using "box representation", in other words, your expression for x_5 is not in fact a Symbol. Retry using x5 for x_5, et cet. |
| Hi, You can perform quite general nodal analysis on arbitrary networks of circuit components using gEDAmath, which is a Mathematica notebook that (optionally) couples to the gEDA open-source Electronic Design Automation toolkit: -... |