User Portlet
Featured Contributor
| Discussions |
|---|
| Write ClearAll[f] before assigning a new definition should work. |
| Very nice! Thanks for sharing. Are you aware of the **Groupings** function? This would solve part of this problem quite elegantly as well. |
| I might be wrong, but your jump is 180 degrees, so it is a fundamentally different jump than a phase-wrap which is 360 degrees. |
| Btw, this could be further optimised as some lines are redundant, but for small plots it should be fine :-) |
| Quite certain this is a bug. Please report. |
| Very cool and impressive! Thanks for sharing! |
| If i would get a euro for every time I see horrible/bad approach… |
| This would be highly non-trivial to write, there are many different (compound) notations. See my post here: http://community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/1070946 There is no short and easy code unfortunately. |
| This is how Mathematica fundamentally works, if you input an exact quantity it will return an exact quantity. Since Erf[2] can not be simply written, it will leave it as is; the simplest way is Erf[2]. If you input a machine-precision number 2.0, it... |
| Option 2 and 3, old ones are not superseded. I chose for option 3: GeneralizedChaosGame because ChaosGame was already taken. |